Australia’s prawn import ban is ‘causing serious damage’ to Vietnamese producers

The Vietnamese Government has accused Australia of “causing serious damage” to its prawn farmers and exporters, and has asked the Federal Government to reconsider the ban on uncooked imports.

Federal Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce announced a six-month suspension on the importation of raw prawns in January, following an outbreak of white spot disease in Queensland.

Vietnam’s Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade, Tran Quoc Khanh, said the ban had damaged his country’s aquaculture industry which exports about $55 million worth of uncooked prawns to Australia. “In our view, the ban is not in line with common practices and the spirit of nurturing and enhancing the existing good trade relationship between Vietnam and Australia,” Mr Tran told the ABC.

“The prawn import suspension imposed by the Australian Government has been causing serious damage to the prawn farmers and exporters in Vietnam. “A number of Vietnamese exporters specialising in the Australian market are facing the risk of going bankrupt due to the suspension.”

Australian authorities are still investigating how white spot disease spread to Australia, while prawn farmers have blamed Asian imports. Mr Tran said Vietnam should be allowed to keep exporting raw prawns to Australia until there was proof foreign imports were the source of the outbreak. “In the case that Australia continues to maintain the ban, Vietnam requests Australia to provide adequate scientific evidence as soon as possible, that shows a causal relationship between the prawn imports from Vietnam and the outbreak of white spot disease in Australia,” Mr Tran said.

Ban could break WTO rules

Vietnam said the ban may be in breach of a World Trade Organisation agreement on how governments could apply food safety measures to traded products, known as sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures. “Some Vietnamese businesses view the suspension as going beyond the necessary extent provided for in the WTO agreement, but we are still studying this point of view of Vietnamese companies,” Mr Tran said.

The Seafood Importers Association of Australia has previously said the ban had damaged Australia’s international trade reputation, but the Department of Agriculture defended the move, saying it was necessary to protect the nation’s aquaculture industry. Mr Tran said he respected Australia’s sovereignty and biosecurity decisions, but nonetheless asked the Federal Government to reconsider the need for a ban.

“We are supportive of the actions taken by the Australian Government in applying necessary measures to control the outbreak,” he said. “This does not imply that we push aside the safety of the Australian prawn farming industry.

Mr Tran said Vietnamese uncooked prawn products had been exported to many countries around the world without facing any import suspension. “We are willing to support the Australian Government’s decision on prawn import suspension but only when — in the case that other measures which have less negative impacts on trade — have proved to be ineffective or useless,” he said.

Vietnam and Australia have disagreed over bilateral agricultural trade before. In 2015, Vietnam effectively banned the importation of fruit from Australia temporarily following a disagreement over Mediterranean fruit fly.

Suspension decision not taken lightly

An Agriculture Department spokesperson said the Government and the department had “the utmost respect for domestic farming industries in Vietnam and across the globe”.

“Our work to support technical market access in countries that Australia exports to, as well as those that we import from, is firmly based on the safety and biosecurity of local industries both in Australia and overseas, as well as the mutual economic benefits of trade,” the spokesperson said. “The department recognises that this suspension will have flow-on effects to Australian consumers and international exporters, including Vietnam.

“The decision to temporarily suspend trade is not one that has been taken lightly.”

The spokesperson said the suspension complied with the provisions of WTO agreements that allowed a member to temporarily suspend imports in certain circumstances.

The decision to suspend prawn imports will not be in place longer than is necessary to ensure the protection of the domestic prawn industry, which remains the first priority, the spokesperson said.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button